When to contact us
- There may be lawful grounds, but the required documents and filing procedure are unclear.
- Information in registers and military records is inconsistent.
- An application has been filed, but no decision has been issued or a refusal has been received.
- The validity period of a document or ground changes and a renewal calendar is needed.
- Support at a territorial recruitment centre or an appeal against a fine or decision is needed.
What we do
- Review of the grounds under the rules in force on the date of the inquiry.
- A list of evidence, the application, filing support and a record of acceptance.
- Data correction, an attorney request, a complaint or a litigation strategy where required.
- We do not use a simplified automatic deferment test or collect medical or military documents through the website.
What you receive
- A written assessment of the grounds
- A personalised checklist
- An application and annexes
- An appeal or renewal plan
Frequently asked questions
We assess only grounds recognised by the rules in force on the enquiry date, matching the legal condition to the individual's actual evidence. The review considers whether the ground exists, consistency of military-record data, sufficiency of evidence, the current filing route and any gaps. At the initial stage, the web form should contain contact details and a general topic only—no diagnoses, medical-commission results, examination records or military-record numbers. After conflict screening, the material list and secure channel are agreed separately. Grounds may change, so an outdated online eligibility test is not used.
That depends on the ground, supporting documents, available official service and the procedure in force on the filing date. Some steps may have a remote route, while others require further action or personal attendance. We first check who must file, where and in what format, and how receipt will be evidenced. Medical or military-record documents should not be sent through the website's initial enquiry form. Even where submission is technically remote, inconsistent data or incomplete evidence may require separate correction; the filing method itself does not guarantee the result.
Obtain the complete refusal or other evidence of the decision and record when it was received. Compare the stated reasons with the application, evidence, military-record data and the procedure in force at the relevant time. The next step may be curing a documentary gap, reapplying, making a complaint or pursuing a court route; the choice depends on the ground and applicable deadlines. Do not resubmit the same pack without analysing the reason. If representation or an attorney-specific tool is required, the individual attorney decides whether to act after an independent conflict check and proper engagement arrangements.
No. Deferment depends on a lawful ground then in force, the actual circumstances, consistent data, sufficient evidence and the competent authority's decision. Legal work can help identify the correct route, prepare the application, assemble evidence and preserve proof of filing, but it cannot create a missing ground or guarantee the authority's conclusion. Rules and official services are checked as at the enquiry date. If the ground has ended, a document is out of date or the data conflicts, that issue must be corrected or addressed before filing rather than concealed.