When to contact us
- Eligibility for a deferment must be reviewed and documented correctly.
- There is a problem with military records, a territorial recruitment centre, a decision or a fine.
- A service member needs a formal military application (raport), military medical commission review, payment, leave, status or discharge.
- A refusal, failure to act or procedural violation needs to be challenged.
What we do
- Three clear routes are available: military records, electronic account, summons or recruitment centre; lawful deferment; and matters for those already serving.
- A separate route for employers covers employee military records, critical enterprise status, mobilisation deferment for employees and liability risks when dealing with recruitment centres.
- The legal position and deadlines are checked against current official sources before work begins and after a legal or service change.
What you receive
- Routing to the relevant service
- A concise document list
- Warnings about deadlines and urgent action
Frequently asked questions
An individual deferment depends on the person's lawful ground and proper evidence supporting it. Employee reservation is arranged for an identified worker through an employer with the relevant status, following the procedure then in force. These are distinct routes: one ground should not be treated automatically as the other, and an undertaking's status does not replace the decision concerning the individual. The facts, military-record data, documents and official filing method must be checked as at the enquiry date because rules and services change. A positive outcome cannot be guaranteed.
First compare the information in your documents with the available official record, identify the precise discrepancy and the document that supports the correction. Then check the current submission channel and procedure, and retain evidence that the request was made. For attendance, prepare identification, relevant military-record documents, copies of supporting evidence and a short chronology; do not send unnecessary medical or other sensitive information through the initial web form. If there is a decision, fine, coercive step or risk to rights, assess in advance whether an attorney-at-law is needed. The rules must be checked on the enquiry date.
No. Decisions on military records, deferment, employee reservation, medical commissions, payments or appeals are made by the competent authority or court. We can check the rules current on the enquiry date, assess the facts and documents, prepare the appropriate application, preserve evidence of filing and map the response to a refusal or inaction. This can reduce procedural errors, but it cannot justify a promised result. If the facts do not support the intended ground or official practice has changed, the assessment says so expressly.
An attorney-at-law should be involved where procedural representation, an attorney information request, an appeal, protection during a coercive or urgent action, or work for which professional status matters is required. An attorney is not necessary in every case for initial routing, a document checklist or a general explanation of procedure. The firm conducts initial conflict screening and the appointed attorney performs an independent conflict check. Availability, timing, geography, the agreement and authority are confirmed for the particular engagement; continuous availability is not promised generally.